ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Employee to be paid for estimated lost overtime following the employer's violation of a Taylor Law agreement?s overtime rotation provision

ADVERTISEMENTS
Employee to be paid for estimated lost overtime following the employer's violation of a Taylor Law agreement?s overtime rotation provision
Matter of Town of Wallkill v Town of Wallkill Police Benevolent Assn., 2008 NY Slip Op 08497, decided on November 5, 2008, Appellate Division, Second Department

The Town Police Chief placed a Town police officer on modified duty. The Chief also said that the police officer was not to be permitted to serve in an overtime capacity. The PBA filed a grievance alleging that the Town had violated the collective bargaining agreement then in force and ultimately the grievance was submitted for arbitration.

The Town and the PBA stipulated that the arbitrator was empowered to determine the appropriate remedy if it was found that the Town violated the collective bargaining agreement.

A hearing was held and the arbitrator ruled that the Chief?s action violated the terms of the collective bargaining agreement addressing assigning police officers to duty and to the provisions dealing with the assignment of overtime on a rotation basis.

The arbitrator then ordered the Town and the PBA to determine the number hours of overtime hours that the officer had worked during the preceding two years. This number would be used to determine the prorata amount that should be paid to the officer to compensate him for the overtime he probably would have worked had the Town not violated the collective bargaining agreement.

The Town attempted to vacate the arbitrator?s award but the Appellate Division ruled that ?vacatur of the arbitration award is not warranted? as the award did not violate a strong public policy, was not irrational, and did not clearly exceed a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power.

The full text of the decision is posted on the Internet at:

http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_08497.htm

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on November 12, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0144 secs (new cache)