ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> AdamsDrafting

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: AdamsDrafting

Nicknames for Contract Provisions

By Ken Adams

ADVERTISEMENTS

Thinking about materiality-scrape provisions had me pondering idly what other contract provisions are known by nicknames. Only three came to mind?ipso facto clauses, anti-sandbagging provisions, and “garden leave” clauses. A lame effort by yours truly.

There are doubtless plenty other such nicknames out there. I invite you, dear reader, to tell us any you can think of. The only rule is that a name for a given provision doesn?t count as a nickname if any element of the nickname appears in the language of the provision, including the heading. So, for example, “further assurances” and “merger” provisions don?t make the cut, and neither does “10b-5 representation.”

Full post as published by AdamsDrafting on November 11, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0247 secs (new cache)