Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Criminal Review
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Criminal ReviewR. v. J. F. (Supreme Court of Canada)
ADVERTISEMENTS
Rather sharp words in a slightly split judgment from the Supreme Court.
At issue was whether a jury rendered an inconsistent verdict in acquitting J. F. on charges of manslaughter for failing to provide the necessaries of life to his foster child, but convicting him on the same facts on a charge of manslaughter by criminal negligence.
I commented on the decision from the Ontario Court of Appeal here, and registered some sympathy for Justice Lang’s dissent in finding some (albeit not a lot) read more
Full post as published by Criminal Review on October 31, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

New Paper on Collegial Decision-Making at the Supreme Court of Canada
How do you replace a Supreme Court Justice
Canadian Supreme Court Confirms Plavix Patent Despite Evergreening Charges
Deeper free online coverage of Supreme Court of Canada Decisions
Supreme Court of Canada to Hear Keays v. Honda Canada Inc.







