Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime and Consequences
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime and ConsequencesStatus Quo at the Supreme Court?
By Kent Scheidegger et al.
Full post as published by Crime and Consequences on November 10, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Wendy's International Inc.
allegedly fired illegal immigrant employees after missing a deadline to obtain legal status.
Signal International
allegedly lured foreign workers to US shipyards with false promises of permanent resident status.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.

SCOKY MONTHLY CASE SUMMARY REPORS: September 2008
Pending U.S. Supreme Court Education Law Cases
SCOKY MONTHLY CASE SUMMARY REPORT: November 2008
SCOKY MONTHLY CASE SUMMARY REPORT: October 2008
SCOKY MONTHLY CASE SUMMARY REPORT: December 2008
U.S. Supreme Court Loses Status
US Supreme Court refuses to consider class action status for Enron shareholders
The Supreme Court and the Anti-Retroactivity Presumption









