Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: inversecondemnationTwo New Categories: Equal Protection, 42 U.S.C. § 1983/Civil Rights
By Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Administrative note: I've added two new categories for indexing posts:
Equal protection comes up often in land use litigation when the government discriminates against a person for belonging to a protected class, and when a landowner asserts she was singled out for different treatment than others who are similarly situated (the "class of one" / Olech claim). The federal civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is a common vehicle to litigate constitutional land use claims in either federal or state courts:
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer?s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Since "property" is a right secured by the Constitution and laws, this statute provides a cause of action for claims such as regulatory takings, due process, and equal protection, among others.
Full post as published by inversecondemnation on November 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Owasso, OK
$300,000 settlement reached in civil rights violations lawsuit.

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
NAACPs Payton Says Now Is Time To Bolster Equal Rights Amendment
Lawsuit Alleges Tattoo Parlor Rules Violate Civil Rights
Exclusionary rule would not apply to equal protection violations
Civil Rights Litigation in the Roberts Court Era
Oral Arguments Scheduled in Fitzgerald
Connecticut Supreme Court Decision Granting Same-Sex Marriage








