Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Quiz Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: Quiz LawMaybe the gays should just take their discrimination and go away quietly...
As we've talked about on this site, and as has been talked about a gajillion other places, California's Prop 8 passed on Tuesday, stripping gay couples of their recently court-granted right to marry. Because, apparently, if they marry, our schools will have to teach our children about gay marriage and our daughters will come home talking about marrying princesses. ...If I ever have a daughter, she could do a helluva lot worse than marrying a princess, but that's beside the point.
Two interesting things yesterday, about this. First is the credible argument that Obama inadvertently helped the demise of gay marriage in California as our state had a record black voter turnout, and blacks were polling in favor of Prop 80 70-to-30, well beyond any other racial denomination. According to one political scientist, while there's been a "generational shift" causing younger voters to be more in favor of equal rights for gays, that shift hasn't hit the black community.
But folks aren't taking Prop 8's success sitting down. The ACLU has filed a petition with the California Supreme Court arguing that the Prop is an improper attempt to chisel away the constitutional right to equality. The linked article doesn't discuss the details, but the basic gist of the argument as I understand it is that California law allows propositions or other methods to make tiny amendments to the California constitution on their own. But where there's a significant change to the constitution, changing its application or effect, the amendment must be legislatively approved. And the Legislature never approved Prop 8 and, thus the argument goes, the amendment to be created by Prop 8 is illegal. The argument sounds good on its face, though I admit to being ignorant on any of the details so I have no idea how strong it will turn out to be. But we can hope.
Full post as published by Quiz Law on November 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Drive Through Discrimination
Jack-in-the Box pays undisclosed racial discrimination settlement to two customers.
Housing Buyer Discrimination
White homeowner settles $30,000 buyer-discrimination lawsuit.
American State Bank Discrimination
$225,000 settlement reached in hiring discrimination lawsuit.
Religious Discrimination
NMSU to pay $165,000 in Muslim discrimination settlement.
Age Discrimination Suit Settled for $8.75 Million
Age Discrimination Class Action Settled for $8.75 Million
Elderly Floridians Win Discrimination Class Action
Florida to Pay $27M Elderly Floridians Win Discrimination Class Action

Is Discrimination Against Ex-Gays Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under D.C. Law
Suit Seeks To Have Ex-Gays Protected By DC Human Rights Act
NEA discrimination against PFOX
Florida sexual orientation discrimination measure passes Senate Committee








