ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Houston's Clear Thinkers

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Houston's Clear Thinkers

Remember that hotel deal you invested in?

By Tom Kirkendall

ADVERTISEMENTS

HiltonThis post from over a year ago reviewed the absurdly highly-leveraged deal that Blackstone Group LP was proposing to make for Hilton Hotels. That deal was a head-scratcher even during the heady days of easy money.

As this W$J article from yesterday notes, the deal ended being structured with "only" $20 billion in bank debt rather than $25 billion (with Blackstone pitching in $6 million in equity), but that really didn't change the fundamental of the deal much. Hilton is projected to generate $2 billion in before-tax cash flow this year, which is enough to cover the $1.3 billion in interest expense on the bank debt. But cash flow is probably going to decline next year because of depressed demand for hotel rooms and Hilton will probably be forced to use its liquidity reserves to make up for any cash-flow short-fall.

Blackstone paid for Hilton at about 13 times estimated 2008 pretax cash flow. Similar public hotel companies are currently trading at about seven times their projected before-tax cash flow for 2008. The WSJ article quotes an analyst on the situation: "It's very difficult to assume any equity if you have to mark to market those assets. But they may argue it's a long-term investment for them." Make that a very long-term investment.

But as bad as this deal looks for Blackstone, it looks even worse for the seven banks that put up the $20 billion in financing. They are, as the WSJ puts it tactfully, "struggling" to sell pieces of the debt package in the current strained credit markets.

Gee, I'm sure glad we steered clear of that investment debacle, huh? Except that we apparently didn't:

[I]t now looks like U.S. taxpayers are on the hook to Hilton's fortunes, too. That's because when J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. in March took over Bear Stearns, the Federal Reserve assumed $30 billion of Bear's illiquid assets. Part of those loans and securities is Bear's $4 billion unsold portion of the $20 billion Hilton financing package, according to people familiar with the matter.

Full post as published by Houston's Clear Thinkers on November 06, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0184 secs (new cache)