ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Feminist Law Professors

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Feminist Law Professors

Federal Appeals Court to Hear Argument in Virginia?s Abortion Ban Case on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 at 8:15 a.m.

By Ann Bartow

ADVERTISEMENTS

From The Center for Reproductive Rights:

Oral argument will be heard at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring.

The Center for Reproductive Rights will be arguing against Virginia ?s ?Partial Birth Infanticide Act,? which would outlaw the most common abortion methods used during the second trimester. Last May, a three-judge panel of the court declared the law unconstitutional. The full appellate court will review that decision at the request of the state attorney general?s office.

Stephanie Toti, a staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights, will represent the plaintiffs, Richmond Medical Center for Women and Dr. William G. Fitzhugh, who brought the suit on behalf of themselves, their staffs, and their patients.

In 2007, the Supreme Court ordered the Fourth Circuit to re-evaluate the constitutionality of the Virginia ban after it upheld a federal ban aimed at a particular method of second-trimester abortion. That ruling came in Gonzales v. Carhart, a case brought by the Center. The appellate court struck down the Virginia law, finding that it was substantially broader than the federal law, exposing physicians to the risk of criminal prosecution and imprisonment for using the safest and most common method of second-trimester abortion. Shortly after the 2-1 decision, Virginia asked the full court to rehear the case. Virginia ’s statute is part of an ongoing campaign by the anti-choice movement to eliminate women’s personal decision-making about whether to have an abortion, and to make doing so even more difficult. In fact, in June 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down Michigan ’s third attempt at a broad ban on methods of abortion. The court characterized the law as pushing every boundary that the Supreme Court imposed in Gonzales v. Carhart.

–Ximena Ramirez

Full post as published by Feminist Law Professors on October 24, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0268 secs (new cache)