Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Feminist Law Professors
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Feminist Law ProfessorsFederal Appeals Court to Hear Argument in Virginia?s Abortion Ban Case on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 at 8:15 a.m.
By Ann Bartow
From The Center for Reproductive Rights:
Oral argument will be heard at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring.
The Center for Reproductive Rights will be arguing against Virginia ?s ?Partial Birth Infanticide Act,? which would outlaw the most common abortion methods used during the second trimester. Last May, a three-judge panel of the court declared the law unconstitutional. The full appellate court will review that decision at the request of the state attorney general?s office.
Stephanie Toti, a staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights, will represent the plaintiffs, Richmond Medical Center for Women and Dr. William G. Fitzhugh, who brought the suit on behalf of themselves, their staffs, and their patients.
In 2007, the Supreme Court ordered the Fourth Circuit to re-evaluate the constitutionality of the Virginia ban after it upheld a federal ban aimed at a particular method of second-trimester abortion. That ruling came in Gonzales v. Carhart, a case brought by the Center. The appellate court struck down the Virginia law, finding that it was substantially broader than the federal law, exposing physicians to the risk of criminal prosecution and imprisonment for using the safest and most common method of second-trimester abortion. Shortly after the 2-1 decision, Virginia asked the full court to rehear the case. Virginia ’s statute is part of an ongoing campaign by the anti-choice movement to eliminate women’s personal decision-making about whether to have an abortion, and to make doing so even more difficult. In fact, in June 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down Michigan ’s third attempt at a broad ban on methods of abortion. The court characterized the law as pushing every boundary that the Supreme Court imposed in Gonzales v. Carhart.
–Ximena Ramirez
Full post as published by Feminist Law Professors on October 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
State of Virginia
$11 million settlement reached in Virginia Tech massacre.
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Repossessed car wins $700,000 Settlement
A class action lawsuit that was brought against Virginia Beach-based Tidewater Finance Co., alleging that the company had questionable repossession practices, has been settled.
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed

Federal Court of Appeals Strikes Down VA Abortion Ban
Federal appeals court strikes down Virginia 'partial birth' abortion ban
"Federal appeals court to review Va. abortion ban"
NC: Court Rehears PartialBirth Abortion Ban Case
Fourth Circuit Accepts En Banc Review of Virginia "Partial-Birth Abortion" Ban
"Court strikes down Va. late-term abortion ban"
ARGUMENTS: Kentucky Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments Oct. 14 in Murray








