ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Disability Law Blogs -> Florida Workers’ Compensation Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Disability Law

: Florida Workers’ Compensation Law Blog

Carrier Waived Statute of Limitations Defense by Failure to Appear at 1997 Hearing

By David A. McCranie, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Batista v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., decided on 10/22/2008, involved a statute of limitations question.  Under the pre-1994 version of the statute, a workers' compensation carrier waives any statute of limitations defense to which it might otherwise be entitled if it fails to assert that defense "at the first hearing of such claim in which all parties in interest are given reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard."  See §440.19(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1986).  In Batista, the claimant had filed a petition for benefits in 1996.  At the same time he filed a request to produce and later, a motion to compel.  Notice of a hearing on the motion to compel was sent to the carrier's adjuster and to the employer in 1997, but neither appeared at the hearing.

 

The 1996 petition remained pending and was not heard until 2007, more than 10 years after it was filed.  At that time, the carrier appeared and asserted that the petition was barred by the statute of limitations because they had not paid any benefits on the claim since 1990, but the claimant argued that the carrier had waived its defense by its failure to assert it at the 1997 hearing on the motion to compel.  Was the hearing on the motion to compel the "first hearing" at which "all parties in interest [were] given reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard"?  The JCC said no, finding that the hearing on the 1997 motion to compel had been inadequately noticed.  But the First DCA reversed this decision, noting that the notice of hearing expressly provided that copies were sent to all parties.  Therefore, the court concluded, the statute of limitations did not bar the claim.

 

Note:  Under the current version of §440.19(4), Fla. Stat., the carrier waives its statute of limitations defense unless it "advances the defense. . . in its initial response to the petition for benefits."

Full post as published by Florida Workers’ Compensation Law Blog on October 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0227 secs (new cache)