Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Seventh Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Seventh Circuit BlogBooker Cert Grants
By Bill Theis
ADVERTISEMENTS
By now probably everyone knows that the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in two Booker cases, one in which the sentence was within the guidelines and one in which the sentence was below the guidelines and the reviewing court reversed. Mario Claiborne v. United States (06-5618) and Victor A. Rita v. United States (06-5754). What the Supreme Court will do with these two cases and what dicta it will create is beyond accurate prediction.But the grant of cert should provide a powerful reminder that the current Seventh Circuit case law on Booker is just that?current. If the Supreme Court should create a more defendant-friendly landscape, we can be certain that those who did not keep these issues alive will have a tough time reaping the benefits of a new test...continue to full postFull post as published by Seventh Circuit Blog on November 06, 2006 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

You want cert grants I got yer cert grants right here!
S.Ct. grants cert. in Booker and Fanfan
Court Grants Cert in FCC v. Fox
SCOTUS Grants Cert. to Consider Expansion of "Objective Good Faith" Exception to Exclusionary Rule
CAAFlog discussion on IAC, appellate practice, and cert. grants
Supreme Court Grants Cert on an Exclusionary Rule Case








