ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Energy Law Blogs -> Energy Legal Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Energy Law

: Energy Legal Blog

GAO Report Urges FERC to Be More Specific on Costs, Benefits of RTO Membership

By Tracy Davis

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Government Accounting Office (GAO) issued a report to Congress on September 26 urging FERC to take additional steps to analyze the benefits and performance of the Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) that manage regional transmission grids.  FERC's development of RTOs has been controversial from the beginning, with many arguing that they ultimately increase electricity prices.  Highlighting this debate, the GAO stated:  "Many agree that RTOs have improved the management of the transmission grid and improved generator access to it; however, there is no consensus about whether RTO markets provide benefits to consumers or how they have influenced consumer electricity prices. . . ."  The GAO specifically criticized FERC's failure to develop standardized measures to track RTO grid operator performance, finding that this failure bred uncertainty about the benefits of RTO membership and led to missed opportunities for FERC to direct improvements in RTOs' operations and markets.

In its analysis, the GAO discussed several areas in which it found FERC's oversight of RTOs to be lacking and offered recommendations.  Specifically, the GAO concluded that FERC does not adequately review RTO financial reports and budgets.  To remedy this, the GAO urged FERC to develop a consistent approach for reviewing RTO budgets, including routine assessments of the accuracy, completeness, and reasonableness of the financial reports that RTOs submit to FERC. 

The GAO also determined that FERC has failed to undertake a comprehensive review of broader RTO performance and benefits, and that this failure resulted in missed opportunities for developing new market rules and improvements in RTO operations.  The GAO suggested FERC work with RTOs, stakeholders, and other interested parties to develop measures to track grid operations and markets.  FERC should also submit an annual report to Congress describing its review and identifying any changes that should be made to address performance concerns.

In response to the report, FERC Chairman Joseph Kelliher generally agreed with many of the GAO's recommendation, in particular, that FERC should increase its review of RTO performance and costs.  Chairman Kelliher noted that FERC Staff is evaluating possible approaches for implementing the GAO's recommendations and that FERC plans to perform periodic audits of financial information in RTOs' financial reporting forms (FERC Form No. 1).  Chairman Kelliher did push back on the GAO's assessment that RTOs stand in a "position of greater public trust" than other public utilities, stating there is no policy reason to view RTOs differently than public utilities. 

Full post as published by Energy Legal Blog on October 09, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0143 secs (new cache)