Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Ross' Employment Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Ross' Employment Law BlogDon't fire the domestic violence victim
Ramona Danny sued in federal court asserting a claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. The federal court sent a certified question to the Supreme Court of Washington.
Has the State of Washington established a clear mandate of public policy prohibiting an employer from discharging an at-will employee because she experienced domestic violence and took leave from work to take actions to protect herself, her family, and to hold her abuser accountable?
The Washington court declined to answer that question, and instead reformulated it as:
Has the State of Washington established a clear mandate of public policy of protecting domestic violence survivors and their families and holding their abusers accountable?
The answer? "Yes." In 5-4 decision, with four opinions.
The court reasoned, "Washington State has unequivocally established, through legislative, judicial, constitutional, and executive expressions, a clear mandate of public policy of protecting domestic violence survivors and their families and holding abusers accountable."
The CONCURRING opinion agreed with the majority's answer to its reformulated certified question, but wrote in part "to express my concern about the burden placed on employers when this court recognizes new public policies..."
The CONCURRING/DISSENTING opinion argued that "the lead and concurring opinions improperly give retroactive effect to...new legislation, inferring a 'clear mandate' of public policy from a statute that did not exist at the time this suit was instituted."
The DISSENTING opinion argued that "[t]he fact that four opinions have been issued-and that we have decided to reformulate the question to avoid the issue entirely-dictates the answer that no such 'clear' mandate exists."
The case: Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services (Washington 10/03/2008)
Majority opinion
Concurring opinion
Concurring and dissenting opinion
Dissenting opinion
Full post as published by Ross' Employment Law Blog on October 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
Domestic Violence
Women's Rights
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Steps to avoid
Employee Lawsuits
Dealing with violence in the workplace
Rightwing Extremism
Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment
Fire Company Duel
Township settles $150,000 fire service lawsuit.
Fire Accidents
alleging fire related accidents can lead to personal injury and property damage.
San Bruno Fire
alleging San Bruno gas explosion fire caused personal injury, death and damage.
Austin Car Accident Victim Awarded $470,000
$470,000 Awarded to Austin Car Accident Victim
Victim of Sexual Attack Awarded $1.4 Million
Victim of Sexual Attack Awarded $1.5 Million
Furnaces Recalled Due to Fire Hazard
Furnaces Recalled Due to Fire Hazard

Domestic violence and some relevant statistics. What do they tell us
Government putting a price on the future of children
Domestic Violence and Traumatic Brain Injury
KS bill would shine light on domestic-violence cases
Domestic Violence Strikes All Kinds, Everywhere
Domestic Violence Carries Stiff Penalties








