ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> ACS Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: ACS Blog

Appeals Court Refuses To Force Bush Aides To Cooperate In Congressional Investigation Over Removal of U.S. Attorneys

ADVERTISEMENTS

A federal appeals court won’t force top Bush administration aides to cooperate with Congress over its investigation of the firings of nine U.S. attorneys in 2006. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled today that it would not have enough time to resolve the issue before the Congress’s term ends on Jan. 3. “Even if expedited, this controversy will not be fully and finally resolved by the judicial branch … before the 110th Congress ends on January 3, 2009,” the appeals court states in Committee on the Judiciary v. Miers. In the summer, a federal judge ruled that former White House counsel Harriet Miers and current presidential chief of staff Josh Bolton must cooperate with the U.S. House Judiciary Committee’s investigation into the matter. House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) told The Associated Press that he thought the appeals court’s ruling was “unfortunate,” but that he held out hope it would be overturned and that “Harriet Miers and other key witnesses will appear before the House Judiciary Committee, and that we will get to the bottom of the Bush administration’s disgraceful politicization of the Justice Department.”

In September, Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed a prosecutor to investigate the removal of the U.S. Attorneys. Mukasey’s action came hours after the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) and Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) released a report of more than 300 pages revealing the political motivations behind the firings of the attorneys. That report was preceded by two other reports from the OIG/OPR detailing the politicization of the Justice Department. The first report issued June 24 concluded that candidates for nonpolitical jobs at the Justice Department were rejected because of their affiliations with progressive organizations, including the American Constitution Society. 

Full post as published by ACS Blog on October 06, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0141 secs (new cache)