Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Kentucky
: Kentucky CasesCRIMINAL: Defendant found to have no standing to challenge KRS 189A.010(2) constitutionality since not harmed by changes in law: VELTROP V. COM. (COA 8/1/2008)
By Michael Stevens
VELTROP V. COM.
CRIMINAL: DUI, standing
2007-CA-000385
PUBLISHED: AFFIRMING
PANEL: BUCKINGHAM PRESIDING; MORE CONCURS; WINE CONCURS WITH SEP. OP.
BARREN COUNTY
DATE RENDERED: 8/1/2008
CA rejected Defendant's challenge to KRS 189A.010(2) as unconstitutional alleging it violated the separation of powers principle by unilaterally adopting amendments or additions to the Kentucky Rules of Evidence (KRE). KRS 189A.010(2) permits the introduction of a breath test taken after the two hour operation window. In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 2136, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992), the U.S. Supreme Court stated as follows: [T]he irreducible constitutional minimum of standing contains three elements. First, the plaintiff must have suffered an ?injury in fact? ? an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) ?actual or imminent, not ?conjectural? or ?hypothetical.? Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of ? the injury has to be ?fairly . . . trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not . . . th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party not before the court.? Third, it must be ?likely,? as opposed to merely ?speculative,? that the injury will be ?redressed by a favorable decision.? Veltrop?s test result was obtained well within the two-hour limit that is set forth as an element of the offense in KRS 189A.010(1)(a).
Because the test result was within that time period, KRS 189A.010(2) had no relevance or application to her case. She therefore could not have suffered any injury or harm. While this portion of the statute may be unconstitutional as a rule of evidence, we fail to see how Veltrop has standing to challenge it.
Digested by Scott C. Byrd
Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on October 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Criminal Law
If you have been arrested or mistreated by police you should speak to a criminal law attorney.
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Wal-Mart
Avoids Criminal Charges over Clerk's Death
Drug Pusher
Biovail agrees to pay $24.6 million settlement in criminal lawsuit.
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
FenPhen
Serious Heart Problems Found In Ex-Users

TN: Defendant has standing to contest a search of his own person
N.J.: Possessory interest sufficient to have standing
Defendant had an expectation of privacy in a borrowed car
For our courts it is often a matter of STANDING
Guest had no standing in the driveway or garage








