Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> InhouseBlog - News and Jobs for Inhouse Counsel
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
In-House Counsel
: InhouseBlog - News and Jobs for Inhouse CounselCorporate Counsel?s Guide to International Arbitration
By guestcontributor
I. When to Opt for International Arbitration
One selects arbitration as the dispute resolution device in a contract for several reasons: (1) to reduce legal costs, (2) for the convenience of the parties in scheduling and presentation, (3) to keep the proceedings and the result confidential, and (4) to avoid trial of claims which could potentially produce large damage awards when decided by other than “commercial” people or in a particular jurisdiction. Add to that list two very significant reasons for selecting arbitration in an international contract: (1) decision enforcement and (2) a neutral forum.
Decision Enforcement. Each country has its own laws and applies those laws within its own borders. That may be an accepted fundamental precept of international law, but, practically speaking, that happens because the country has the force and the control to accomplish that result within its own borders. The extent to which a country’s laws will be recognized outside its borders by other countries is limited. There is no international legal or enforcement body to require a country to recognize the decisions of another country. One country recognizes the decisions of another purely by “comity” or “as a favor” to the other country. In many commercial countries, having a foreign country judgment has virtually no effect. You must try your lawsuit all over again. In others, having a judgment limits the defenses which can be raised, but one still essentially must try one’s case twice. Even the United States, thought to be a commercially and legally advanced country, has no federal statutory law on recognition or enforcement of foreign country judgments. There is state statutory law. (c) 2008 Chris Helmer, Esq. (more…)
** Find an In-House Counsel Job @ InhouseBlog.com’s Job Board. **
Full post as published by InhouseBlog - News and Jobs for Inhouse Counsel on October 04, 2008 (boomark / email).
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
DLP
Ohio State to Receive $42 Million in Corporate Taxes Settlement
AT&T International Roaming Charges, AT&T lawsuit
AT&T Faces International Roaming Charges Lawsuit
Preliminary Settlement Reached With Soleus International
Soleus International Reaches Preliminary Settlement of Class Action
Anixter International Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Anixter International Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Moody International Facing Unpaid Overtime Class-Action
Moody International Facing Unpaid Overtime Class-Action

CA1: suing non-parties to arbitration agreement, doesnt get around mandatory arbitration
International Arbitration: An Overview
Anti-Arbitration Bills Imperil the Universal Benefits of Consumer Arbitration
International Arbitrators Launch Newsletter








