ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

?Dismiss It!?; Senator Stevens Trial Suspended for Withheld Evidence

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

stevensAs we said yesterday, thank you notes can count for a lot. How much? For Senator Ted Stevens, who faces charges that he accepted and failed to report more than $250,000 in gifts, it may mean a mistrial.

Here’s what happened, according to Legal Times. Click here, also, for the Times story. Today, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan suspended the trial of Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, after it was revealed in court that prosecutors withheld FBI records that could have aided in Stevens’ defense, a.k.a., Brady material. The records in question, according to Legal Times, showed that the government’s star witness, former VECO CEO Bill Allen, who testified on Tuesday and Wednesday, told federal investigators that he believed Stevens would have paid for the renovations he is accused of omitting on his financial disclosure forms if the senator had received the invoices. Here’s another report from the WSJ. (This is the second evidentiary spat in the trial.)

The government waited until last night to hand the records over, which Brenda Morris, the lead prosecutor, imputed to “human error.”

“It strikes me that this was probably intentional. I find it unbelievable that this was just an error,” Judge Sullivan said. According to the WSJ, he also said: “Thank goodness we don’t have to rely on the United States to give [Stevens] a fair trial.”

At one point, lead defense attorney Brendan Sullivan reportedly turned to Morris and fumed, “Dismiss it!”

Morris conceded Stevens’ lawyers should have gotten the records sooner but declined to say who on her team made the error. She said the omission had caused no harm because Allen was still on the stand.

Sullivan scheduled a hearing at 4:30 p.m. today to determine how to proceed. Stay tuned.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on October 02, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0131 secs (new cache)