ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation Support

: Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence

WHEN LOGIC AND PROPORTION HAVE FALLEN SLOPPY DEAD: JUDGE REFUSES TO QUALIFY CERTIFIED FORENSIC EXAMINER BECAUSE HE HAS A BIOCHEMISTRY DEGREE

ADVERTISEMENTS

If you go into enough courtrooms, you?ll see it all. You?ll watch an irate judge order a bailiff to bring him an attorney?s ringing cell phone and throw it out the courtroom window. You see a judge fall sound asleep while hapless attorneys try to carry on. You?ll see a dimwitted attorney who somehow got a gun through security cause a near riot when he pulls it out of his briefcase, in a misguided attempt to introduce it into evidence (just before the bailiffs wrestle him to the floor). You?ll see an attorney have the temerity and stupidity to tell a judge that she is a few French fries short of a happy meal.

The courtroom can be a crazy place. Alice really is six feet tall and things in Wonderland sometimes have very little rationality.

So with that as a backdrop . . . one of our forensic examiners went to testify as an expert in a routine case this week (somewhere here in Virginia, though prudence keeps me from naming the judge or the court). He is a certified forensic examiner, holding the CCE, and he has previously qualified as an expert. He has also spent several years doing nothing but computer forensics, and served as the Director of Computer Forensics at another company. This did not matter to the judge, who for some incomprehensible reason became fixated on the fact that the examiner had an undergraduate degree in biochemistry. This biochemistry degree, he announced solemnly, had no relation to computer forensics and he thereupon refused to qualify the examiner as an expert.

You might think this is from the theater of the absurd, but alas, it is just another day in court, where the truly bizarre is standard fare. Ah, this explains it . . . there?s a hookah smoking caterpillar in the corner . . .  feed your head . . . feed your head . . .

E-mail: snelson@senseient.com     Phone: 703-359-0700

Full post as published by Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence on January 30, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0136 secs (new cache)