ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds Journalist Shield Law in Prison Cases

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS
<p><font size="2"><strong>Source: </strong><em>Crime and Justice News, </em>September 26, 2008.</font></p> <p><font size="2">"The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has upheld a state law that protects news reporters from being forced to disclose confidential sources, saying reporters have a 'right to report news, regardless of how the information was received,' reports the Philadelphia Inquirer. In a 4-1 decision, the court reaffirmed the shield law, enacted in 1937, and said it provided an 'absolute protection' of a source's identity - even if the information involves a grand-jury matter. 'The Shield Law was enacted to protect the free flow of information to the news media in their role as information providers to the general public,' Chief Justice Ronald Castille wrote." </font></p> <p><font size="2">"The ruling came in a case in which two former Lackawanna County commissioners sued the Scranton Times-Tribune over a 2004 story that reported that they were not cooperative during grand- jury testimony about alleged brutality at the county prison. Representing the ex-commissioners, Philadelphia attorney Richard Sprague contended that an exception should be made because the communication violated the state Grand Jury Act and constituted a crime. Sprague questioned whether a source even existed and said the two former commissioners should be allowed to find out to help press the defamation case against the paper. The justices said that only those who take an oath of secrecy before a grand jury can violate that oath." </font></p> <p><a href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001-uBO4BGgRzNuzmxu7pzFzAHduueZhOKriFWm3ImxfLpF5xl-sLv3rrFcizRXiBZzD-A11ESi2mDMtYT3HcMPpzPbRSOINyYzdyt41yfQl19E16T9ikVUIb4lq-VC-0TtkmQvJOijj1ZAcAsE5Pq98nqIUqfhJ0UXHexBArta2K52gjD4lWSdKI5UnnSs-VMS__WvGIjiLQswjVI8cB8kdA==" shape="rect" color="#0000FF" target="_blank"><font size="2">Philadelphia Inquirer</font></a><font size="2"> </font></p>

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on September 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0217 secs (new cache)