Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomA 3L in Federal Court: Observations of the Nacchio Argument
By William Garehime
As you know, students who contribute to The Race to the Bottom frequently follow ongoing litigation. The Nacchio trial is one such example. Today, two students, Trevor Crow and myself attended en banc hearing for the Nacchio appeal. For the two of us, the federal courthouse was an uncomfortable environment and a far cry from the comforts of law school.
My first observation was that Maureen Mahoney was under fire. Mahoney began her argument by stating the government?s theory. It claims the defendant forfeited his right because the defense failed to say, ?I want a hearing.? Immediately Judge Briscoe interrupted Mahoney and stated, ?Isn?t that a pretty good theory?? Before Mahoney could finish her answer, Judge Holmes interrupted and asked about whether the district court could properly exclude the witness without giving the defendant a hearing? Mahoney responded that the exclusion was a ?surprise? and that it was the court's obligation to hold a Daubert hearing. Briscoe, who was noticeably antagonistic, further questioned Mahoney about why the court should have the obligation when Nacchio is the one who wants the expert to testify. At one point, Judge Lucero said he was ?perplexed? by the defense's argument.
On the light rail ride back to school, several things became apparent. We were both surprised how nine judges engaged two of the country?s best appellate attorneys. To be sure, Mahoney took the more difficult questions. But even with mostly softballs, at one point Judge Holmes saw fit to rescue Edwin Kneedler from Judge McConnell ?s inquisition. As a student observer, I left feeling that no experience in law school has prepared me to handle such an examination. The Socratic Method leaves much to be learned. Even the best had trouble persuading the court. As both Trevor Crow and Professor Brown note, it seems the court will vacate the panel?s decision and reinstate the conviction.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on September 26, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.

"What you need to know about Nacchio appeal"
The Appeal of Joe Nacchio: The En Banc Hearing
Nacchio Conviction Reversed, Remanded for New Trial
"U.S. fights to bar Nacchio witness"
En Banc Hearing in Nacchio Case









