ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

A 3L in Federal Court: Observations of the Nacchio Argument

By William Garehime

ADVERTISEMENTS

As you know, students who contribute to The Race to the Bottom frequently follow ongoing litigation. The Nacchio trial is one such example. Today, two students, Trevor Crow and myself attended en banc hearing for the Nacchio appeal. For the two of us, the federal courthouse was an uncomfortable environment and a far cry from the comforts of law school.

My first observation was that Maureen Mahoney was under fire. Mahoney began her argument by stating the government?s theory. It claims the defendant forfeited his right because the defense failed to say, ?I want a hearing.? Immediately Judge Briscoe interrupted Mahoney and stated, ?Isn?t that a pretty good theory?? Before Mahoney could finish her answer, Judge Holmes interrupted and asked about whether the district court could properly exclude the witness without giving the defendant a hearing? Mahoney responded that the exclusion was a ?surprise? and that it was the court's obligation to hold a Daubert hearing. Briscoe, who was noticeably antagonistic, further questioned Mahoney about why the court should have the obligation when Nacchio is the one who wants the expert to testify. At one point, Judge Lucero said he was ?perplexed? by the defense's argument.

On the light rail ride back to school, several things became apparent. We were both surprised how nine judges engaged two of the country?s best appellate attorneys. To be sure, Mahoney took the more difficult questions. But even with mostly softballs, at one point Judge Holmes saw fit to rescue Edwin Kneedler from Judge McConnell ?s inquisition. As a student observer, I left feeling that no experience in law school has prepared me to handle such an examination. The Socratic Method leaves much to be learned. Even the best had trouble persuading the court. As both Trevor Crow and Professor Brown note, it seems the court will vacate the panel?s decision and reinstate the conviction.

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on September 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0128 secs (new cache)