ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Supreme Dicta
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Supreme DictaQuick Thought for Harlan and Holmes (and the other four of you)
ADVERTISEMENTS
So I'm taking a seminar this semester on free speech, and I've picked out my paper topic. I'll be writing on Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 (1972). The case held that a college professor's dismissal could not be upheld on summary judgment on his lack of a contractual or tenure right to employment when he claimed that his dismissal was due to public criticism of the administration. The question I'm asking is basically, what's the likely decision on the merits of this question? Short answer is, I dunno - but I'm gonna find out.What do you guys think?
Full post as published by Supreme Dicta on August 20, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Hayes Bicycle Group
Recalls Quick-Release Devices
Medtronic
Recalls Specific Lots of Paradigm Quick-Set Infusion Sets
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Like Abbott and Costello, except nerdier
Andrew Holmes joins Manatt Phelps as counsel
Police Taser kills Moberly man
Looking Back at the Wonderland Murders
Charon Podcast with Nick Holmes







