ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> California Family Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Family Law

: California Family Law Blog

San Jose Family Law Attorney Discusses Epstein Credits

By Scott Sagaria

ADVERTISEMENTS

San Jose Family Law Attorney Discusses Epstein Credits

Given that it takes a minimum of six months and one day to obtain a divorce in California, it is common for one spouse to continue paying community debts while the divorce is pending. When a party uses his or her separate property for community purposes after separation, that party, as a general matter is entitled to reimbursement. These reimbursements are commonly known as Epstein credits, so named after the Marriage of Epstein (1979) 24 Cal. 3d. 76, 84. Circumstances under which reimbursement is appropriate is the subject of case law. The Court has found, for example, that if one party used their separate property funds to make mortgage payments on a community residence, the paying party would be entitled to reimbursement. The Court has also found, for example, that the value of a spouse?s post separation services necessary to complete performance owed by the community under a contract made during marriage is subject to reimbursement. Using the authority of Epstein, and in appropriate circumstances, the Court has also ordered reimbursement to the community when one party unilaterally uses community property to pay for his or her separate obligations, after separation.

It is important to note that reimbursements are discretionary and the Epstein Court did specifically indicate that it would be unreasonable to expect reimbursement under certain circumstances such as: (1) when there is an agreement between the parties that payment would not be reimbursed, (2) when the paying party truly intended the payment to constitute a gift to the community, (3) when the payment was made on a debt for the acquisition or preservation of an asset the paying party was using, and the amount paid was not substantially in excess of the value of the use, (4) or when the payment constituted a discharge of the paying party?s spousal support or child support duty.

The team of attorneys at Sagaria Law, P.C. deals with all aspects of family law and can assist you through any stage of your divorce, custody, or support litigation. We serve clients through the bay area and have offices Santa Clara, Alameda, and Monterey Counties. Contact our office today to set up a free consultation with one of our attorneys.


Full post as published by California Family Law Blog on January 18, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0159 secs (new cache)