ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> Death and Taxes Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Taxation & Estate Planning

: Death and Taxes Blog

Wills and Trusts With Incorrect Family Information

By Joel A. Schoenmeyer

ADVERTISEMENTS

Here?s a problem that I?ve encountered a couple of times recently: people who intentionally misstate their family situation in their estate planning documents. In both cases, the testator did not list all of his or her children in the section of the Will usually entitled ?My Family.? Note that this is different from disinheriting, although that appears to be the purpose behind the exclusion.

Let me give an example:

Testator has four children, Adrian, Betty, Caliope, and David. Testator?s Will says, ?I have two children now living, Adrian and Caliope,? and leaves all of testator?s property to ?my children who survive me.?

This language raises three problems:

1. Is it effective to disinherit Betty and David? If I represent either of them, I say that the language leaving the property to ?my children who survive me? governs, since the testator obviously was incorrect in stating that he had two living children.

2. This language also gives Betty and David a better argument for contesting the Will. Would you say that someone who misstates the number of their children is competent?

3. In some cases, the disinherited children don?t wish to contest the Will. This is the case where the Will was trying to do something the testator wanted to do (cut out two children), but did it incompetently. (The best way to disinherit is to say it specifically.) The issue is that the probate attorney needs to be able to go into court and show the decedent?s family situation to the judge. Next month I will go to court and ask a judge to rule that a decedent had four children, despite the decedent having a Will that says he had only two children. That could create problems.

To expand on this last point, I?m starting to think that heirship should be set forth more explicitly in estate planning documents. Usually I do this roughly, with a section entitled ?My Family,? listing spouse and living children. But maybe we should go one step further? I recently had a situation where a decedent died leaving hard-to-pin-down heirs. The decedent was unmarried, and had no children or living parents or siblings. It took quite a bit of time to track down her two heirs (cousins), because the beneficiary/sole heir didn?t really know about the decedent?s family situation. It would have been better to get the heirship information from the decedent during the estate planning process.

Full post as published by Death and Taxes Blog on September 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0121 secs (new cache)