ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Construction Law Blogs -> The South Carolina Construction Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Construction Law

: The South Carolina Construction Law Blog

Homeowner's Refusal to Make One Payment in a Construction Installment Contract Constitutes a Substantial Breach of the Contract

By Ryan McCabe

ADVERTISEMENTS

    The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently decided that a homeowner's refusal to make an installment under construction contract constituted a substantial breach of the contract.  See Silver v. Aabstract Pools, 376 S.C. 585, 658 S.E.2d 539 (Ct. App. 2008).

    A homeowner and contractor contracted for the construction and installation of an in-ground swimming pool. The contract called for five payments upon the completion of five scheduled tasks. The homeowner made three of the payments according to the schedule, however, the homeowner refused to make the fourth payment because he opined that the job was only approximately 20% complete and the payment schedule did not correlate with the progress of the job. The case was heard by the Master-in-Equity who determined the contractor had breached the contract when the contractor ceased work on the project and removed his equipment because the plaintiff refused to make the required payment. The contractor appealed the decision and the Appellate Court found in his favor. The court held that the contract was clear and unambiguous. Furthermore, the court refused to look beyond the four corners of the contract to determine its meaning. The homeowner could not change the agreed upon terms in midstream because he was unhappy with them. The court found no evidence that the contractor had breached the contract, and since the homeowner?s refusal to pay was a substantial breach of the contract, the contractor had the right to cease work and recover the value of work already performed. As the first party to breach, the homeowner must bear the liability of his nonperformance. The court awarded the contractor damages for the nonperformance, attorneys? fees, and court costs. 

    This site and any information contained herein is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek a competent attorney for advice on any legal matter.

Full post as published by The South Carolina Construction Law Blog on July 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)