ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> Law Department Management

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

In-House Counsel

: Law Department Management

Four points about law firms from an Economist column

By Rees Morrison

ADVERTISEMENTS

Insights about huge law firms, publicly-traded law firms, their profit margins, and commercial ?nous? all appear in one item in the Economist, Aug. 23, 2008 at 55.

Vast revenue at huge firms. Baker & McKenzie brought in annual revenues of more than $2 billion (See my post of Feb. 20, 2008: Latham & Watkins and Skadden Arps breach $2 billion.). Further ?Britain?s top four firms have reported revenues up by an average of 15% this year, with all four passing the £1 billion ($1.85 billion) mark.? It?s hard for any but the largest law departments to have much leverage over such behemoths (See my post of May 3, 2006: consequences of firms growing to behemoth size.).

Use of equity funds. An Australian firm that went public in May 2007, Slater & Gordon, used the money it raised to swallow up six smaller rivals within a year. Law firms in Britain are champing at the bit to have the same opportunity. Law department managers can foresee even more tumult among their providers and continued consolidation (See my post of Nov. 15, 2005: consequences of convergence and mergers.).

High profit margins. Law firms typically have high profit margins (20-40%). The article states that ?On average, litigation departments are thought to account for around 45% of law firms? revenues in America, and 25% in Britain.? Even with those fat margins, ?Few managing partners know their firm?s profit per billable hour, even though that is the main product law firms sell.? Very few companies enjoy such salivating profit margins, which ought to give general counsel reason to aggressively challenge law firm fees (See my post of April 6, 2008: profitability of several law-firm practice groups.).

Narrow view, not commercial. ?Clients frustrated with private practice lawyers often accuse them of lacking commercial nous.? No nous is bad news. As outside lawyers are focused on the fine print, ?big picture concerns can go unnoticed.? One fundamental advantage of in-house lawyers over out-house lawyers is that they have their ear to the business ground.

Full post as published by Law Department Management on September 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0133 secs (new cache)