Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> Law Department Management
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
In-House Counsel
: Law Department ManagementFour points about law firms from an Economist column
By Rees Morrison
Insights about huge law firms, publicly-traded law firms, their profit margins, and commercial ?nous? all appear in one item in the Economist, Aug. 23, 2008 at 55.
Vast revenue at huge firms. Baker & McKenzie brought in annual revenues of more than $2 billion (See my post of Feb. 20, 2008: Latham & Watkins and Skadden Arps breach $2 billion.). Further ?Britain?s top four firms have reported revenues up by an average of 15% this year, with all four passing the £1 billion ($1.85 billion) mark.? It?s hard for any but the largest law departments to have much leverage over such behemoths (See my post of May 3, 2006: consequences of firms growing to behemoth size.).
Use of equity funds. An Australian firm that went public in May 2007, Slater & Gordon, used the money it raised to swallow up six smaller rivals within a year. Law firms in Britain are champing at the bit to have the same opportunity. Law department managers can foresee even more tumult among their providers and continued consolidation (See my post of Nov. 15, 2005: consequences of convergence and mergers.).
High profit margins. Law firms typically have high profit margins (20-40%). The article states that ?On average, litigation departments are thought to account for around 45% of law firms? revenues in America, and 25% in Britain.? Even with those fat margins, ?Few managing partners know their firm?s profit per billable hour, even though that is the main product law firms sell.? Very few companies enjoy such salivating profit margins, which ought to give general counsel reason to aggressively challenge law firm fees (See my post of April 6, 2008: profitability of several law-firm practice groups.).
Narrow view, not commercial. ?Clients frustrated with private practice lawyers often accuse them of lacking commercial nous.? No nous is bad news. As outside lawyers are focused on the fine print, ?big picture concerns can go unnoticed.? One fundamental advantage of in-house lawyers over out-house lawyers is that they have their ear to the business ground.
Full post as published by Law Department Management on September 22, 2008 (boomark / email).
Whole Foods
And Other Firms Sued by California Attorney General,
Brown Greer et al.
alleging that the six law firms handling the Vioxx settlement failed to provide money for reimbursements to lien rights of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans.

You Might Be An Economist If...
Why partners are probably lying
UK Changes Allow Investing in Law Firms
The Economist -- Debate on whether Rising Food Prices can be Good for Humanity
More bird-watchers: Henry Paulson's excellent adventure.








