Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> The Sentencing Project
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: The Sentencing ProjectRead News: Disenfranchisement News
By The Sentencing Project
ADVERTISEMENTS
Alabama: Inmate Voter Registration Efforts Halted
National: Disenfranchisement Gets National Attention, Gains Momentum
Mississippi: Lawsuit Demands Right to Vote
South Carolina: Elections Officials in Need of More Training
Oklahoma: Election Board Passing on Faulty Information, ACLU Survey Documents
Tennessee: Excitement About Election, Elections Officials See Registration Increase
Florida: Statewide Ad Campaign Targets Individuals with Felony Offenses
Virginia: Increase in Vote Restoration
Posted Date:9/19/2008 9:09:07 PMFull post as published by The Sentencing Project on September 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Murphy City, TX
$255,000 settlement in controversial pedophile news program case.
Newspaper Employees
Chinese Daily News must pay $5.19 million class action settlement for failing to pay overtime.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

BET special on felon disenfranchisement issues
New Sentencing Project report on felon disenfranchisement
Read Publication: Felony Disenfranchisement Rates for Women
Read Publication: Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in The United States
Politics, Race And Felon Disenfranchisement
ADF attorney available to discuss disenfranchisement of Oregonians after 9th Circuit hearing








