Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> New Jersey Estate & Elder Planning Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Taxation & Estate Planning
: New Jersey Estate & Elder Planning BlogCharitable Deduction Denied - Single Trust has Charities and Non-Charities as Beneficiaries
By Deirdre R. Wheatley-Liss, Esq.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (which controls District Court decisions in New Jersey) finds that the Internal Revenue Code prohibits an estate from claiming a charitable deduction when the proceeds of a single trust are distributed to both charitable and non-charitable beneficiaries. Galloway v. U.S. (3rd Cir. 6-21-2007), No. 06-3007.
James Galloway created a single trust under which the beneficiaries -- his two children and two charitable entities -- would receive an equal, one-quarter share in the proceeds. Upon Mr. Galloway?s death, the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue determined that $399,079.33 would be distributed to charitable entities.
Before reading on, some better solutions to meet Mr. Galloway's goals might have been have been:
- Flat amount bequest to chartity
- Percentage bequest to charity before transferign the balance to a trust (ie - make the division to the charities and then directe that the amoun to the children go in a trust)
- Set up a Charitable Remainder Trust or Charitable Lead Trust, which are statuorially authortized divisions of bequests between a charity and one or more induviduals
- Name the charity as a beneficiary on a non-probate asset such as an IRA or other retirement plan
The trustee of the estate, Edmond Galloway, then claimed a charitable deduction in that amount on the federal estate tax return. Based on Internal Revenue Code § 2055(e), the IRS disallowed this charitable deduction and computed the estate?s liability to be $306,604.57. Mr. Galloway paid the additional tax due and then filed a refund claim, which was denied by the IRS.
Mr. Galloway filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania claiming that the trust did not fall under the purview of IRC § 2055(e). Mr. Galloway argued that the only kind of such ?split-interest? trusts that Congress intended § 2055(e) to cover are trusts in which a non-charitable beneficiary has a life interest and the charitable beneficiary has a remainder interest. The complaint was denied and Mr. Galloway appealed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, affirms and holds that the clear, unambiguous language of IRC § 2055(e) disallows any charitable deduction where an interest in the same property passes to both charitable and non-charitable beneficiaries.
To download the full text of this decision in PDF format, go to: http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/063007p.pdf .
Full post as published by New Jersey Estate & Elder Planning Blog on July 03, 2007 (boomark / email).
Unclaimed $14 Million Settlement
Ohio Charities to Benefit
Bunn-O-Matic
Recalls Single Cup Tea/Coffeemakers
Bush Administration
class action settlement ensures Medicaid beneficiaries can continue to purchase prescription drugs at minimum cost when they become eligible for Medicare.
Aetna Life Insurance
Houston Woman Denied $426,000
Sea Star Agrees $18.5M Settlement in Anti-trust Class Action
Sea Star Agrees $18.5M Settlement in Anti-trust Class Action
Atlas Cold Storage
Income Trust to pay $40 million to settle a class action that claims misrepresented financial statements.

How Americans View Charities: A Report on Charitable Confidence, 2008
Charities and Politics: A Phillipic
Mirkay on Discrimination by Charities
Do charities (or charitable gifts) deserve special tax treatment
Charities Lose Out on $8 Million
New MySpace graphics promote wise charitable giving







