ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

Private Debt & Corporate Governance

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

Today I get to present my latest paper, Private Debt and Corporate Governance, at Larry Ribstein's Corporate Colloquium, which is part of the Program on Business Law and Policy at Illinois.  It's almost (but not quite) ready for public consumption yet, so no link to SSRN today.  But here's the abstract:

The influence of private lenders pervades public companies. From the first day of a lending arrangement, loan covenants and built-in contingency provisions affect managerial decision making. Conventional corporate governance analysis has been slow to notice or incorporate this lender influence. The few prior accounts of creditors? influence over managers have emphasized the drastic actions creditors take when a firm is in serious trouble, overlooking the more routine influence private lenders enjoy even absent financial distress.  In this Essay, I explain the regularity of lender influence on managerial decision making, showing that even routine lender influence may rival the influence of boards of directors. Corporate governance includes more than corporate law, and I argue for a broader conception of corporate governance that incorporates recent learning on lender influence.

While lenders of course intervene when their borrowers encounter distress, recent empirical work demonstrates lender influence at much earlier points in the debtor-creditor relationship, against the conventional wisdom.  In addition to the effects of initial loan terms, a subsequent covenant violation may trigger active lender intervention.  This scenario is commonplace, however, and rarely portends financial distress.  Lenders may pursue a range of responses.  Waiving the violation is the most common response; imposition of additional constraints on managerial discretion is also common.  Calling the loan is quite rare.  Initial covenants and subsequent violations effectively reallocate control from managers to lenders, in a fluid process that commences with the inception of the lending arrangement.  This pervasiveness of lender influence has important implications for corporate governance policy making and future research.

The full draft will be posted soon.

Full post as published by Conglomerate on September 15, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0162 secs (new cache)