Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: inversecondemnationCourt Strikes Facial Due Process and Equal Protection Claims in Maui Affordable Housing Exaction Case
By Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The US District Court for the District of Hawaii has granted (in part) the County of Maui's motion for reconsideration of the court's earlier order granting in part and denying in part the County's summary judgment motion. Here's a copy of the court's latest order.
The court entered summary judgment in favor of the county on the plaintiff's facial equal protection and facial due process claims, and allowed the "class of one" equal protection claim, and the as-applied equal protection and due process claims to proceed.
The case involves a Maui property owner's challenge to the County's "workforce housing" exaction ordinance, which requires a property owner to commit 40% to 50% of the units in most new housing developments to below-market-rate ownership or rental. Kamaole Pointe Development LP v. County of Maui, No. 07-00447 DAE. The plaintiff challenged the ordinance under the Nollan/Dolan doctrine of unconstitutional exactions, which requires the government to show a substantial nexus between the exaction and some problem caused by the property owner before the government may demand tribute as a condition of development, and that the exaction is roughly proportional to the problem.
In July 2008, the court held the plaintiff's Nollan/Dolan claims are takings claims that are not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985). The district court's lengthy opinion held that despite labeling its claim as one under the "unconstitutional conditions doctrine," the claim was a facial takings claim which is subject to Williamson County's requirement that the plaintiff first seek -- and be denied -- compensation via state procedures.
Both parties have also moved for summary judgment (briefs available here). Hearing is scheduled for later this month.
Full post as published by inversecondemnation on September 13, 2008 (boomark / email).
Fair Housing Act
Prevent discrimination by landlords
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Condo Eminent Domain
Maui pays $4.1 million settlement to property owner.
Injured Immigrant Worker
Owner of Billy G’s Tree Care pays former employee $30,000 settlement after sustaining a severe chainsaw facial laceration.
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.
LINA - Cigna Life Insurance Company of North America Disability Claims
LINA Insurance alleging violations of disability insurance claims.
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
KB Home and Countrywide Financial Corp.
allegedly conspired with appraisers to boost housing prices as the market crashed.









