Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> FindLaw's Common Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: FindLaw's Common LawCourt Reinstates Shareholder Suit Over Vioxx
A federal appeals court on Tuesday reinstated a lawsuit brought by investors who had purchased stock in Merck & Co., Inc. -- manufacturer of the painkiller Vioxx -- and allege that Merck?s officers and directors misrepresented the drug?s safety and commercial viability.
Vioxx, once a hugely-popular prescription pain medication, was pulled from the market in 2004, due to its link to increased risk of serious cardiovascular problems like heart attack and stroke. Shareholders filed the class action securities fraud lawsuit against Merck & Co., Inc. in 2003. A federal trial court dismissed the shareholders? suit in April 2007, ruling that too much time had passed between the date on which the shareholders should have been aware of Merck?s alleged fraud and the date the suit was filed, so the claims were barred by the statute of limitations.
In Tuesday's ruling, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit stressed that a plausible alternative explanation for Vioxx patients' increased cardiovascular risk -- a theory that the court calls the "naproxen hypothesis? -- still existed on dates relevant to the statute of limitations. In reinstating the suit, the panel ruled 2-1 that the lower court "acted prematurely" in finding that the shareholders were on legal notice of the alleged fraud on the date that would have made the claims time-barred, because "[a]s of that date, market analysts, scientists, the press, and even the FDA agreed that the naproxen hypothesis was plausible, at the very least."
Reuters reports that Merck "is considering asking either the full court of appeals or the U.S. Supreme Court to review the panel's decision," while "[l]awyers for the plaintiffs applauded the ruling and said it will permit them to move forward with the case, which seeks billions of dollars in damages."
- Read Tuesday's Ruling from the Third Circuit Panel [PDF file]
- Reuters: Court Reinstates Vioxx Investor Suit Against Merck
- Bloomberg.com: Merck Must Face Shareholder Fraud Suit Over Vioxx
- Merck to Begin Vioxx Payments (FindLaw's Common Law Blog 7/21/08)
- Vioxx Health and Legal Information (FindLaw)
Full post as published by FindLaw's Common Law on September 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Brown Greer et al.
alleging that the six law firms handling the Vioxx settlement failed to provide money for reimbursements to lien rights of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans.
Vioxx Advertising
Merck agrees to pay $58 million settlement in multistate lawsuit.
Insurers
Reach $80 Million Settlement with Merck over Vioxx
Marvell
Settles Shareholder Class Action for $72 Million
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

9th Circuit Reinstates Suit on Gays in Military
Breaking: Merck wins two more Vioxx reversals on appeal
AIG Settles Long-Standing Shareholder Suit
"Federal Court Reinstates Suit on Gays in Military"
Merck extends registration deadline in settlement for former users of Vioxx









