Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> The Corridor Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: The Corridor Law BlogI?ll take the Supreme Court Opinions with a side of onion rings
By esittig
So, four new opinions from The Supremes today. I was getting disappointed until I read the last one, but we’ll get to that.
Holstein Electric v. Breyfogle - An injury to a wrist should be compensated as an injury to the arm, rather than one to the hand.
In re the Marriage of Briddle - Can’t we all just get along. It appears that the District Court took revenge on the husband in this case for being difficult during the discovery process. Not really a seminal case, in my opinion.
State of Iowa v. McKinney- District Court ordered Bremer County to pay material witness fees to someone held as a material witness to testify at his father’s accused killer. Supremes say the State should pay those, not the County.
And now, for your, um, pleasure (or Mr. Isaac’s):
State v. Isaacs- Mr. Isaacs was convicted of indecent exposure for masturbating outside the bedroom windows of two different women. The women heard noises outside, but never looked to see what they were. There was some knocking on one window and something rubbed against the screen of the other. One of the women called the police, but they didn’t find anything at her house. As one officer was leaving, he saw Isaacs standing at the other woman’s window. The officer yelled, Isaacs turned around, exposing himself to the officer, and took off running. The officer tackled the man, turned him over, placed Isaascs parts back in his pants and arrested him.
Isaacs was convicted of one count of interference with official acts, two counts of harassment and one count of indecent exposure. He appealed the indecent exposure conviction. The Supremes say he’s right. To be convicted of indecent exposure, a person must expose his genitals to another to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of either party. While Isaacs certainly had exposed himself to satisfy his own sexual desires, no other person actually saw his genitals until the officer yelled. Since Isaacs only inadvertently exposed himself to the officer when he turned and ran, it was not for the purpose of arousing or satisfying either of their respective sexual desires.
Thanks Justice Ternus. Fun stuff. Have a good weekend.
By the way, I almost referred to Isaacs as a seminal case, but chose not to. You can thank me later.

Full post as published by The Corridor Law Blog on September 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Ortho Evra Patch Risk
Ortho Evra Side Effects
Nevada Onion
Workers Injured, EPA Files Complaint
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Simplicity
Recalls 400,000 Drop Side Cribs
Reglan
for alleged side effects such as Tardive Dyskinesia.
Bonavita Cabana
Drop Side Cribs Recalled

Another Great Satire from The Onion:
The Onion Explains FCC Censorship
Military Justice and Art. I Court news
UPDATE: Wedding rings stolen after woman died
Weekend Viewing From the Onion







