Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesAntitrust Risks in Patent Pools and SSOs
By Philip Brooks
Strafford Publications is hosting a live 90-minute telephone conference on avoiding price fixing and exclusionary conduct. The conference is scheduled for September 23, 2008 from 1:00 to 2:30 p.m Eastern.
Patent owners work together to facilitate interoperability of products through standard setting organizations (SSO) and patent pools.
SSOs help develop industry standards for particular technologies and patent pools offer a package for licensing essential patents to make a standardized product. However, both raise antitrust concerns.
Patent owners received good news when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned the FTC?s ruling in Rambus. Patent owners must still be wary as antitrust authorities in other jurisdictions, including Europe, will likely take a tougher stance toward SSO conduct.
Listen and participate from your telephone as our authoritative panel of antitrust attorneys examines SSOs and patent pools, the current state of the law as it relates to them, the antitrust pitfalls and strategies for structuring them to avoid antitrust violations.
The panel includes:
- Carl W. Hittinger, Partner, DLA Piper, Philadelphia
- Erica S. Mintzer, Counsel, Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D.C.
- Jeffrey Blumenfeld, Partner, Crowell & Moring, Washington, D.C.
More information and registration are available here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on August 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
MRI Health Risks
alleging gadolinium based contrast agents pose health risks.
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Asbestos-like Nanotubes
Pose Serious Health Risks
Black Henna Tattoos with PPD
Pose Serious Health Risks

Standard Setting and Patent Pools
Patent and Antitrust: Differing Shades of Meaning
Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law
Patent Pools, RAND Commitments, and the Problematics of Price Discrimination
Patent & Antitrust At Duke Law School
Panelists: Balance Needed Between Antitrust Law, Patent Quality








