Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerFinal approval and attorneys' fees orders in Ford Explorer Cases
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
Many thanks to the blog reader who forwarded these orders signed by Judge De Alba in the Ford case (Ford Explorer Cases, JCCP Nos. 4266 & 4270):
(Amended) Final Order and Judgment of Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (filed Jul. 30, 2008)
Ruling on Application for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses; Request for Multiplier; Plaintiffs' Incentive Awards; and Objections (filed Jun. 27, 2008)
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on August 19, 2008 (boomark / Ford Explorer Cases&linkurl=http://www.uslaw.com/library/Class_Action/Final_approval_attorneys_fees_orders_Ford_Explorer_Cases.php?item=217410' rel=nofollow title='The UCL Practitioner'>email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Cell Phone Early Termination Fees
How to recover billing errors
Parmalat SpA
Italy's biggest dairy company awaits final approval for a securities settlement that would pay investors $10.5 million
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Sprint
Receives Preliminary Approval of $17.5 Settlement for Early Termination Fees
MindWare
Animal Tracking Explorer Kit Recalled
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Ford Explorers
Ford Motor Co. agrees to give out $500 vouchers to SUV owners in class action settlement.

Coupon Settlement in Ford Explorer Class Action
Ford Loses Appeal In $82.6 Million Explorer Rollover Lawsuit
Ford Explorer Class Action Settlement
Chatham County Clerk Now Requires Approval of Attorneys Fees in Probate
Car Accident Involving Ford Explorer Leads to Huge Verdict-Then Reversal
Ford rollover case heads to Calif. high court









