Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentReasonable suspicion of DUI
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Driving and reasonable suspicion of intoxication:
State v. Penix, 2008 Ohio 4050, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 3427 (11th Dist. August 8, 2008):
[*P11] In Evans, we set forth a non-exclusive list of factors to be considered when determining whether a police officer has a reasonable suspicion of intoxication justifying the administration of field sobriety tests. That list, on which no one factor is dispositive, consists of the following:
[*P12] "(1) the time and day of the stop (Friday or Saturday night as opposed to, e.g., Tuesday morning); (2) the location of the stop (Whether near establishments selling alcohol); (3) any indicia of erratic driving before the stop that may indicate a lack of coordination (speeding, weaving, unusual braking, etc...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on August 15, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Probably Not a Good Way to Avoid Reasonable Suspicion:
Ninth Circuit Rules that Laptop Searches Dont Require Reasonable Suspicion
Third Circuit Requires Reasonable Suspicion for Border Searches of Sleeping Compartments
Flashing lights mean stop [NOT FINAL]









