Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Institutional Shareholder Services -- Corporate Governance Blog

Corporate & Securities Law

: Institutional Shareholder Services -- Corporate Governance Blog

Yahoo! Revised Vote Count Underscores Need for Reform of Proxy Voting ProcessSubmitted by: L. Reed Walton, Publications, and Ted Allen, Publications

Investors heard last week that votes against the re-election of Yahoo! board members were significantly higher than initially reported, due to an error.

Four directors -- Chairman Roy Bostock, CEO Jerry Yang, Ronald Burkle and Arthur Kern -- all received greater than 30 percent opposition at the company?s Aug. 1 annual meeting. The company had previously reported that no board member received more than 22 percent withhold votes. Another director, Gary Wilson, had just under 30 percent opposition, according to a company press release. The revised release, dated Aug. 5, notes that the error originated with Broadridge Financial Services, the firm that Yahoo uses to collect and tabulate shareholder votes.

No other directors received greater than 10 percent opposition. Incumbent director Robert Kotick is due to step down, as the board expands to accommodate billionaire investor Carl Icahn and two of his dissident nominees under an agreement that pulled the plug on Icahn?s bid to replace the entire board in a proxy contest. The three new Yahoo directors are likely to be appointed around Aug. 15, Dow Jones Newswires reported.

The company?s initial vote tally announcement, just after the meeting on Aug. 1, caught the attention of Yahoo critic Eric Jackson, founder of Ironfire Capital. Jackson leads a network of investors owning approximately 3.2 million Yahoo shares. He noted a discrepancy of about 200 million shares between the number of votes cast for directors last year and this year. After Jackson wrote about the error in his weblog, Capital Research Global Investors--which owns a 6.2 percent Yahoo stake--asked for a recount. According to the Associated Press, Capital opposed Yang and figured that he would have received more than the 14 percent opposition originally reported.

Broadridge said that a printing error was responsible for the incorrect results and re-issued the tallies, according to the AP. The revised results show that investors withheld 33.7 percent support from Yang, whereas opposition to his election was minimal last year. Bostock and Burkle had the most re-election opposition this year, with 39.6 and 37.9 percent withholds, respectively, versus dissent of 31.2 and 32.5 percent, respectively, in 2007.

The vote at Yahoo underscores the complexities of proxy voting in the U.S. market, where ownership is widely dispersed and about 85 percent of company shares are held in ?street name? by brokers and other custodians. Edward Rock, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania who co-wrote a 2007 paper, ?The Hanging Chads of Corporate Voting,? said the proxy voting process is ?crude, imprecise, and fragile.?

?Broadridge delivers more than 1 billion communications to investors per year. . . . It is an accident waiting to happen,? Rock said, according to MarketWatch.

?When it comes to the tabulation of proxy votes, most investors don't even know what they don't know,? said Pat McGurn, special counsel at RiskMetrics Group. ?The tabulation process is as airtight as a sieve. It is as transparent as a brick wall. Simply put, the proxy voting infrastructure has failed to keep pace with the complexity of the investment process. It is only a matter of time until there is a complete meltdown at a significant meeting. Officials from the SEC, the stock exchanges, and Delaware must come together with key market players to fix the system.?

Full post as published by Institutional Shareholder Services -- Corporate Governance Blog on August 12, 2008 (boomark / email).