ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Groklaw

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Groklaw

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Files Motion to Modify Terms of TRO

By Pamela Jones et al.

ADVERTISEMENTS
The lawyers for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority have just filed a motion asking for a modification of the terms, but not the duration, of the temporary restraining order [PDF] it won against the MIT students who had wanted to present a security paper at DEFCON on vulnerabilities in Boston transit cards. I'll show you the motion. It asks that the terms be altered to "correct any public or intra-party misperception concerning the TRO and the MBTA's goals in this matter" so we don't get the impression they are trying to act unConstitutionally by interfering in free speech.

I'd say the cluetrain is nearing the station. It's a culture clash thing, from the looks of it, like maybe the MBTA folks thought they were dealing with script kiddies, and now they realize that others view this paper as authentic security research, which is mostly already out there anyway. This Declaration of Eric Johanson [PDF], a security consultant for the MIT students, might be what started the plaintiffs realizing this was a horse of a different color. Johanson states that it is his professional opinion that the information in the slides of the MIT presentation are based on public information, and that the key information needed to compromise the security of the MBTA's system is excluded from the presentation.

[ Update: EFF says it will appeal the TRO.]

But here's the kicker. The MBTA filed the students' report as an exhibit with PACER, which included the confidential information the students had deliberately excluded from their presentation, thus making it publicly available to the world. The students' attorney, Jennifer Gralnik, writes to the MBTA suggesting they urgently remove it. Which they have, from all I see. You can read her email in this exhibit [PDF] on the last two pages.

Full post as published by Groklaw on August 11, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0132 secs (new cache)