Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousIEEE Standards: FTC Finds Patent Enforcement "Unfair Competition" Based on Patentee's Prior Offers to License
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
Federal Trade Commission v. N-Data (FTC Complaint and Settlement 2008)
The FTC has announced both a complaint and settlement with the patent enforcement company N-Data.
N-Data had purchased Patent Nos. 5,617,418 and 5,687,174 from a distressed company (Vertical Networks) who had received the patents from National Semiconductor. Both patents related to NWay ethernet technology that has become an IEEE standard.
An Encumbrance: National was interested in having its technology adopted as an IEEE standard. Consequently, prior to assigning away its patent rights, National wrote to the IEEE with a promise to “offer to license its NWay technology to any requesting party …. on a nondiscriminatory basis” for a one-time fee of $1,000. The evidence showed that each party in the chain of patent title were aware of those statements at the time of transfer. Soon after the promise, IEEE adopted the NWay standard.
Enforcement: Despite the $1,000 license promise by its predecessor, Vertical (and subsequently N-Data) began enforcement proceedings — asking rather for a reasonable royalty totaling approximately $20 million per year.
FTC Complaint: In a 3–2 decision, the five-member FTC voted to issue a complaint against N-Data’s activities under Section 5 of the FTC Act. That section provides the Commission with authority to stop unfair methods of competition and deceptive commercial practices. The Majority opinion particularly noted the problem of “lock-in”: “Respondent engaged in conduct that was both oppressive and coercive when it engaged in efforts to exploit licensees that were locked into a technology by the adoption of a standard.”
This holding is notable because there is no finding that N-Data had monopoly power or any antitrust liability. Consequently, Chairman Majoras (writing in dissent) had difficulty finding any oppression. Majoras likewise had difficulty characterizing the sophisticated corporate players on the IEEE committee as “victims.” “The novel use of our consumer protection authority to protect large corporate members of a standard-setting organization is insupportable.”
N-Data chose not to fight and has agreed to the majority findings.
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on January 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
TransUnion
Class action credit practices suit offers free credit monitoring services for millions.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Compound License
Palatin Technologies pays Competitive Technologies $800,000 agreement dispute settlement.

Search for Prior Art Using IEEE
FTC Consent Order on Breach of Patent Licensing Commitment Made During Standards-Setting
FTC Looking to Break Down "Patent Walls" For Standardized Technologies
If You Read One Article on Antitrust This Year. . .








