ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Lowering the Bar

ACLU Says It Will Go To Bat For Mullets If Necessary

By Kevin Underhill

ADVERTISEMENTS

00saggychart0709_2 Last week I reported (again) on the continuing battle to secure the homeland against the threat of sagging pants, a battle that had flared up in Flint, Michigan, where Chief David Dicks announced that disorderly conduct/indecent exposure laws would be pressed into service depending on the nature of the infraction.  The Detroit Free Press created this helpful graphic (click to enlarge) in an effort to educate the public as to what is and is not permitted under the Flint enforcement scheme.

As I also mentioned last week, an anonymous commenter on one site had questioned the ACLU's impartiality, suggesting it would not have gotten involved had the threat been to the customs of a different culture, such as the wearing of mullets or flannel shirts.  I wrote the ACLU to ask about that:

Dear Michigan ACLU:

I've been following with interest the battle with David Dicks in Flint over his anti-low-pants crusade.  See, e.g., http://www.loweringthebar.net/2008/07/update-flint-po.html.

I am mentioning it today in another related post, and I had a question.  An anonymous commenter on the Minneapolis Star-Tribune's website alluded to the racial overtones of this debate, by saying, "Would the ACLU lodge a complaint if a town [banned] mullets or flannel shirts? " he wrote.  "Doubtful."

But you would, wouldn't you?  You may dislike mullets as much as I do, but I'm sure you would go to bat for the right to wear them.

Sincerely,
Kevin Underhill
www.loweringthebar.net

The ACLU replied:

If the police were stopping and searching individuals simply because they sported mullets or flannel shirts, of course we would object.  In a free society, an unconventional (or conventional) hair style or shirt does not constitute probable cause to charge a person with a crime or search a person.

Michael Steinberg
Michigan ACLU Legal Director

That's what I thought.  And may that day never come, but just in case it does:

Mullet_chart_6

You may wish to act accordingly.

Link: Michigan ACLU, "Enforcement of Flint Saggy Pants Rule is Unconstitutional and Must Be Stopped," (July 14, 2008).

Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on August 08, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0125 secs (new cache)