Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> TinytechIP
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: TinytechIPUS Patent 7407704 - Nanoparticle-based bond joint for ease of separation
This patent from Henkel teaches the use of nanoparticles in a bonding adhesive that allows the bond to be more easily removed using electromagnetic fields. Claim 1 reads:
1. A separable bonded joint comprising an electromagnetically activatable primer layer and an adhesive layer adjacent to the primer layer, wherein the primer layer contains nanoscale particles with ferromagnetic, ferrimagnetic, superparamagnetic or piezoelectric properties.
Full post as published by TinytechIP on August 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
Hawaii Divorce Laws
How to end a marriage in paradise
Divorce Laws
How to end a marriage
Bail and Bail Bonds
How you get out of jail
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Developer Investment
Raffaello Follieri agrees to $12 million joint venture settlement.
Joint Venture
Gallaher Group agrees to pay Reynolds American $387 million contract dispute settlement.
Search Engine Optimization Claims
Web based company pays over $150,000 settlement in Internet lawsuit.

Obviousness is Reviewed De Novo
Article on Introductory Joint Session in Mediation
In re Swanson: CAFC Allows Reexamination Based on Reference Previously Considered by PTO and Courts
Can I have a "legal separation"
Federal Circuit affirms district court's decision setting aside $1.5 billion infringement verdict








