ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> TalkLeft

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: TalkLeft

Strike Three?

By TChris

ADVERTISEMENTS

Edmond Brandy's first strike was robbing a Beef Bowl with a BB gun at age 19. While serving his sentence, he earned his second strike for his involvement in a prison yard fight. Brandy, now 32, faces 25 to life if he's convicted of his third strike.

Brandy has been charged with pointing a gun at another motorist in an alleged episode of "road rage." The California Highway Patrol traced the car to Brandy. Two months after the alleged incident, the police raided his house to search for a gun. They didn't find one, but they arrested him anyway.

The people in the car who say they were threatened can't get their stories straight. [more ...]

The victims’ descriptions of the gun that Brandy allegedly brandished are inconsistent. Arias and his girlfriend told the police they saw “a black gun with a round barrel.” However, Ray Monroy, the third victim sitting in the left rear passenger seat, described it as “a nickel-plated semiautomatic weapon with a square type barrel.” The district attorney’s office wasn’t able to produce Monroy as a witness at the preliminary hearing because he couldn’t be located.

Adrian Arias, the driver, couldn't positively identify Brandy at the preliminary hearing. So the prosecution has a shaky ID and inconsistent descriptions of a gun the police can't find. Why do they want to bring this case to trial? Even the judge at the preliminary hearing is puzzled.

Before sending the case to trial, Judge James O. Perez, who presided over the preliminary hearing, questioned whether the prosecution would be able to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt with the evidence it has.

“The burden of proving the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is not required in evidentiary hearings,” explained Judge Perez, who added, “If I were sitting in the jury, I wouldn’t vote for a conviction.”

Brandy should not be exposed to the risk of 25 to life on such meager evidence.

Since getting out of prison, Brandy has worked to change his life, dedicate himself to his family and help at-risk teenagers make the right decisions. ...

“Even a judge saw the lack of evidence in my husband’s case,” said [his wife] Raeleen Taylor Brandy, a behavior therapist for delinquent juveniles. “He’s never owned a gun in his life.”

Three strike laws compound the tragedy of wrongful convictions. Let's hope the prosecution decides to drop the charge before it goes to trial.

Full post as published by TalkLeft on August 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0172 secs (new cache)