Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Baristas
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent BaristasDeputy Director of US Patent Office to Leave. Who?s Next?
By Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Well, it looks like Margaret Peterlin, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), has announced that she will be leaving the USPTO in August with plans to pursue employment opportunities in the private sector. It was probably going to happen some time after January 20th of next year anyway.
Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez appointed Margaret J.A. Peterlin, formerly a national security House aide, to serve as Deputy Under Secretary. Before joining the USPTO, Ms. Peterlin was Counsel for Legal Policy and National Security Adviser for the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, J. Dennis Hastert.
Earlier, patent antagonist Greg Aharonian complained that the appointment of Ms. Peterlin to her position was unlawful because she does not have “a professional background and experience in patent or trademark law” as is apparently required under 35 U.S.C. § 3(b).
After a short run in the courts, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a lawsuit against the Secretary of Commerce for hiring an allegedly incompetent person to office. See Gregory Aharonian, et al. v. Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Commerce (07-1224) . See the complaint at: http://www.bustpatents.com/peterlin.pdf.
The U.S. District Judge held:
A claim alleging violation of the standard in 35 U.S.C. § 3(b) is unreviewable under the [Administrative Procedure Act], however, because 35 U.S.C. § 3(b) lacks standards that a court could meaningfully use in evaluating this type of high-level personnel decision. Because the only statutory standard is vague and highly subjective, the decision whom to appoint Deputy Director must be considered “committed to agency discretion by law.”
This kind of case makes you wonder why we have a rule that can’t be enforced because it’s too vague. I’m sure we’ll see more political appointees leaving their posts as January nears.
See more:
Can You Sue to Remove a Political Appointee Who Doesn?t Meet the Job Description?
When is a Patent Office Appointee Qualified? Judge Says Always.
Full post as published by Patent Baristas on July 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
OfficeMax Recalls Office Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
OfficeMax Recalls Office Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Investor Fraud
Company president and director Gregory William Rivers to pay $10,000 shareholder fraud settlement.
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support

Deputy Director Peterlin Announces Resignation
USPTO Deputy Directors Qualifications Backed; Lawsuit Could Return
What the Director's Letter Didn't Say
Margaret J.A. Peterlin leaving USPTO
Opening: Deputy Law Library Director, Loyola New Orleans








