Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: SCOTUSBLOGNew Second Amendment case in D.C.
By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group
Dick Anthony Heller, the private guard whose desire to have a gun in his Washington, D.C., home won the right to do that from the Supreme Court, returned to federal court on Monday with a claim that his new-found right has already been violated. Joined by two other Washington residents, Heller filed a lawsuit to challenge the just-enacted District of Columbia gun law replacing provisions struck down by the Supreme Court. The complaint in Heller, et al., v. District of Columbia can be found here. (The case does not yet have a docket number in District Court.)
The lawsuit contended that the D.C. City Council violated his Second Amendment right by adopting a new ban on machine guns written so broadly as to outlaw “ordinary handguns and other firearms which are semiautomatic,” by authorizing local police to impose “onerous” new restrictions on registering handguns, and by enacting new limits on when a gun in the home could be loaded and unlocked or disassembled.
Heller and another resident, Absalom F. Jordan, Jr., asserted in the lawsuit that they had been denied permits this month for semiautomatical pistols because the weapons were each treated as a “machine gun.” A third resident, Amy McVey, contended, as did the other two Washingtonians, that they were required to go through extensive checks in order to try to register handguns. They also contended that the new restrictions on having handguns loaded and unlocked in the home were unduly burdensome on their right to have a gun for self-defense.
The lawsuit asked the Court to strike down the challenged provisions under the Second Amendment, to issue an order requiring the registration of semiautomatic pistols (if those shoot no more than 12 shots without reloading manually), to bar the new requirement that any gun offered for registration go through a ballistics text, and to nullify the new restrictions on having a gun ready for self-defense at home.
Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on July 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis

After 220 years, should the Second Amendment stay minimalist
What does D.C. v. Heller mean for *First* Amendment Rights
"The Second Amendment and Personal Preference"
The Agnes Wright Case and Loans vs. Gifts
Court Citing the Second Amendment In Way That Helps Gun Owner:
What will be the Next Constitutional Amendment









