ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Malpractice Blogs -> New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Malpractice

: New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

Thelen Reid's Legal Malpractice - Patent Case

By (Andrew Lavoott Bluestone)

ADVERTISEMENTS

Law.Com reports that:

"A former tech client of Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner has filed a malpractice complaint against the firm and one of its partners and contends the firm concealed that it was simultaneously working for a key competitor.

Delaware-based IVI Smart Technologies Inc. and two subsidiaries claim that Thelen, led by San Jose, Calif., partner David Ritchie, "actively assisted" the competitor in the repeated theft of intellectual property resulting in an alleged drop in the companies' market capitalization from $200 million to $20 million, according to the complaint.

"This is a case about the deceit, divided loyalties, and gross violations of professional standards and fiduciary duties by Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner," the three companies claim in the suit, filed June 12 in New York's Southern District federal court.

A call to Thelen's attorneys in the case was referred to a firm spokesman who said, "We generally do not comment on ongoing litigation, but we believe the claims made in the lawsuit are without merit and we will vigorously defend against the allegation." The firm has not yet responded to the suit.

IVI and its subsidiaries, e-Smart Technologies Inc. and Biosensor LLC -- all of which develop fingerprint verification technologies -- allege in the complaint that Thelen helped siphon their IP to competitor Michael Gardiner and his associates and related companies.

The complaint says Thelen represented IVI beginning in 2004. Patricia Douglas, a lawyer representing Gardiner in a separate action filed by e-Smart, said Thursday that she and the other two attorneys representing him had cited the concurrent representation in asking Thelen to withdraw from representing e-Smart, which Thelen did on Jan. 30, 2007.

E-Smart hired Thelen, according to the complaint, to protect its IP in negotiating a manufacturing agreement with Gardiner and his company, A-Card.

Full post as published by New York Attorney Malpractice Blog on July 29, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0201 secs (new cache)