ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> FinancialCounsel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: FinancialCounsel

Survey Shows That Corporate Purchasers Of Auction-Rate Securities State That Dealer Support Of Auctions Either Was Implied Or Expressly Stated, Despite Ultimate Demise Of Auction Markets

By James Eccleston

ADVERTISEMENTS

Recently, the Financial Times discussed an interesting aspect of the auction-rate securities debacle.  In an article entitled, "Auction-Rate Securities 'Implied Support', Joanna Chung discussed what investors thought they were buying.

She stated:

The vast majority of investors in some of the "safest" bonds hit by the credit squeeze were led to believe they would be bailed out in case of trouble, according to research to be published Monday. 

More than 85 per cent of companies that invested in the collapsed market for auction-rate securities thought Wall Street banks would provide support during crises, research shows.

The findings could lead to further strains between banks and their customers over the now-defunct market, one of the biggest casualties of the credit squeeze and the subject of numerous regulatory probes.

The $330bn auction-rate securities market was routinely used by companies looking to park cash in liquid, highly-rated securities that offered slightly higher yields.  While the securities are long-term debt, interest rates are periodically set at auctions, and so appealed to investors seeking short-term debt. 

"Organisations based their confidence in the liquidity of [the] instruments on the belief that dealers would support the markets regardless of market conditions," according to a survey by the Association for Financial Professionals.

Nearly 70 per cent of corporate treasurers whose organisations held auction-rate securities said dealer support was implied, while 17 per cent said they were "told explicitly that the investment bank would ensure that the auctions would not fail."

Many top companies "believed, incorrectly, that dealers would support the auctions if bidders failed to materialise", aid the survey, which is based on 342 respondents, of which about 30 per cent invested in auction-rate securities at some point in the past four years.

The collapse of the market started in February as banks withdrew support from the sector and has left investors holding illiquid securities with long-term maturity profiles.

In one of the first regulatory actions to stem from the probes, the Massachusetts state securities regulator last week filed civil fraud charges against UBS for allegedly misleading investors about the securities, allegations that the Swiss bank denies.

SNSFE continues to investigate and counsel both individual and corporate clients who bought auction-rate securities.

Source:  Financial Times

Full post as published by FinancialCounsel on July 24, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0142 secs (new cache)