Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Cleveland Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Cleveland Personal Injury LawyerHouse Bill Would Subject Foreign Manufacturers to Liability in U.S. Courts for Defective Products Sold in the US
By Halli Brownfield
Many recent news reports have documented the recurring problem of defective goods manufactured in China that are being sold in the United States and injuring Americans. A recent article published in the Ohio State Bar Association's magazine, Ohio Lawyer, by Douglas Oliver entitled "China's shortcomings with product safety and satisfaction have left Ohio lawyers turning to Ohio's product liability law for answers" explains that Chinese products account for a disproportionately high percentage of U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recalls. Mr. Oliver explains that this is in part attributable to a phenomenon known as "quality fade" in which manufacturers secretly and deliberately increase their profits by reducing the quality of materials they use. This decrease in quality is purposefully gradual to keep U.S. importers from noticing these changes.
Obtaining U.S. jurisdiction over these foreign manufacturers and subjecting them to liability in an American court can be problematic. It certainly seems unjust to permit these foreign manufacturers to make large profits by selling their defective goods to the American public while at the same time evading responsibility for the injuries they cause. This injustice has not escaped Congress's attention. On May 1, 2008, Rep. Linda Sanchez, a democrat from California, introduced the Protecting Americans from Unsafe Foreign Products Act (H.R. 5913). This bill would make serving foreign manufacturers who knew or should have known that their products would be sold or used in the United States much easier. In a hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law, an Atlanta attorney detailed his two year legal battle with a Chinese manufacturer of a defectively designed scooter that killed his client's thirteen year old daughter. While claiming to have sold $120 million in goods in the U.S., this manufacturer resisted the lawyer's attempts to seek justice for his clients in an American court.
Foreign manufacturers who profit from selling their goods to American consumers must be forced to compensate Americans for injuries caused by their products. This bill is important step for ensuring safety and justice to the American consuming public.
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Halli BrownfieldFull post as published by Cleveland Personal Injury Lawyer on July 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
Federal Transportation Equity Act of 2005
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
House Closing
Sealing a home sale
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
Pork BBQ Products Recalled
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced Oct 20 that the Murphy House in Louisburg, N...
Nestle USA
Recalls Toll House Refrigerated Cookie Dough Products
CVS
Consumer Products Sold Past Their Expirey Dates
School House Abuse
Selwyn House School agrees to $5 million teacher molestation settlement.
DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS: Bugaboo Strollers Recalled
Defective Products
Novara Trionfo Bicycles Recalled

Dallas Defective Products Lawyer: Defective Products Can Cause Serious Injury
California Products Liability Law; The Sophisticated User Doctrine; is now the Law of California.
PRODUCTS LIABILITY IN CALIFORNIA; WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW.
California adopts Sophisticated User Doctrine for Products Liability
US Marshals Seize Cosmetic Eye Product









