ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Michael Geist
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Michael Geist61 Reforms to C-61, Day 21: TPMs - No Exception to Protect Minors
By Michael Geist
ADVERTISEMENTS
An exception that surprisingly is not included in Bill C-61's anti-circumvention provisions is an exception to protect minors. How does this arise in the context of copyright? One obvious example are parents who wish to stop their children from watching certain scenes in a movie. There are services such as ClearPlay that purport to edit out sex, violence, and profanity from regular DVD movies. Regardless of one's view of such practices, surely it ought to be the right of a parent who has purchased the DVD edit a scene for their family's personal viewing purposes. Yet under Bill C-61, a parent who wants to shield their children from such content risks violating the law in order to do so.Creating an explicit exception for the protection of minors is fairly common in other countries. Taiwan's anti-circumvention provisions include a blanket exception to protect minors (Article 80ter), while Singapore's Copyright Act features an exception to the anti-circumvention provision where the circumvention is "to prevent access by minors to any material on the Internet." There may well be other instances where a parent or school wishes to protect minors but faces the prospect of violating the law by circumventing a digital lock. Canadians should not be placed in that position - the law needs an amendment to address this issue.
Full post as published by Michael Geist on July 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
US Army Corps of Engineers
Class action dismissed for allegedly failing to protect New Orleans from the levee breach.
Racist Voicemail
Stamford Board of Education pays student $37,500 settlement after failing to protect her from racial discrimination.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Gaming Website Charged with Failing to Protect Minors
Man indicted for trafficking minors for sex business www.privateofficer.com
Marriage of minors, marriage between minors
Federal Law Compels States to Register Minors on Sex Offender Registry
Sex Offender E-Mail Registry Proposed To Protect Minors Online








