Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Writing Blogs -> AdamsDrafting
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Writing
: AdamsDraftingHaving a Parent Company Enter Into a Contract ?On Behalf? of an Affiliate
By Ken Adams
A reader recently asked me the following question:
We frequently sign global services agreements that provide that the parent company is signing “for and on behalf” of an affiliate. What do you think of this practice?
I’m uncertain about having a parent sign a contract on behalf of an affiliate. (In any event, the words “for and” are redundant.)
Who has the obligations under these contracts? You have two choices. The affiliate could have the obligations, as in “The Affiliate shall ….” Or the parent could have the obligations, as in “The Parent shall cause the affiliate to …”
Given that it’s the affiliate that’s to perform the services under the contract, it would make sense to have the affiliate bear the obligations. The only reason to have the parent bear the obligations would be to make it liable for the affiliate’s failure to perform. But that could be accomplished more economically by having the parent guarantee the affiliate’s performance of some or all of its obligations.
But let’s assume that you nevertheless elect to have the parent bear the obligations. In that context, I think it’s unhelpful to say that the parent is entering into the contract “on behalf of” the affiliate. By signing the contract, the parent is assuming obligations that run only to the parent, not to the affiliate, so the parent is in effect entering into the contract on its own behalf.
So in answer to your question, I wouldn’t have a parent enter into a contract “on behalf of” an affiliate. Instead, my preferred option would be to have the affiliate sign and make the parent the guarantor. My second choice would be to simply have the parent sign the contract, without any “on behalf of” language.
One context where “on behalf of” might make more sense would be when performance is by a division. But I’d express the concept differently, as I noted in this post.
Full post as published by AdamsDrafting on July 16, 2008 (boomark / email).
California Limited Liability Company Formation
Relevant information for starting a limited liability company in California
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Racketeering Class Action Filed on Behalf of Foreclosed New York State Homeowners
Racketeering Class Action Filed on Behalf of Foreclosed New York State Homeowners
NCAA and Ticketmaster
alleging they have a monopoly on college sports events and charge non-refundable fees to enter a lottery for the rights to purchase tickets to the sporting events.
AnchorBank
$1.27 million in construction contract termination lawsuit.
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Expedia
$184 Million Breach of Contract Settlement Reached

GETTING PAID: Music Publishing Company: Simple Set Up Steps
Workers Compensation Claim Release of "Affiliate" Entities Was Not Ambiguous
WC Release Bars Claimant's Pending Tort Claim Against Employer's Sister Corporation
Need ShopToEarn contract information
FERC Seeks Industry Input on Uniform Definition of "Affiliate"







