Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The FRAUDfiles Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: The FRAUDfiles BlogState supreme court rules in favor of taxpayers
By Tracy Coenen
It’s rare these days that taxpayers get any relief from the clutches of governments, led by politicians who love to spend, spend, spend. In Wisconsin, the taxpayers got a small victory. The state supreme court ruled that the state was improperly collecting sales taxes on customized computer software. The government will have to refund $265 million to taxpaying businesses!!!
I can just hear the liberals… their wailing and gnashing of teeth…. as they believe that taxes should be taken from people and businesses by any means possible. Well, there are laws about how taxes are to be collected and on what sales taxes must be paid. And the Wisconsin Department of Revenue is being forced to follow those laws.
Here’s how this came about: Menasha Corporation was charged sales tax on software it purchased, with WIDOR claiming that it was prewritten software and therefore subject to 5% sales tax. The supreme court ruled that the software was in fact customized software, which is not subject to sales tax.
Not only will Menasha get their money back, other companies could (and should!) file claims with the state to recover sales tax they paid on customized software. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that this will “cost” the state $265 million.
WRONG! It’s not “costing” the state anything. It’s giving back to taxpayers money that the state illegally took from them. When a auto thief is forced to return a stolen car, we don’t say that it “cost” him a car. We say that he had to give back what belonged to the original owner. Our view of taxes should be no different. If our government steals from taxpayers, they should return the money and no one should feel badly.
Copyright © 2008 Sequence Inc. All rights reserved.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
d8e155abd66dfea6417f56f6831614fa)
Full post as published by The FRAUDfiles Blog on July 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.

Shocker - U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Employees!
"Supreme Court rules in favor of Washington state top-two primary"
High Court, 7-2, Rules in Favor of State Tax Collectors During Bankruptcies
New Jersey Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Web Surfer’s Privacy Online
"US court rules in Quanta's favor in LG patent case"
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of the Detainees in Massive Blow to Bush Administration









