Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentCA8: Losing a suppression motion then saying "no objection" to admission at trial is a waiver of suppression issue
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Saying "no objection" when evidence the subject of a lost suppression motion is offered at trial is a waiver of the suppression motion. Thus, the issue had to be viewed under clear error. United States v. Comstock, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14489 (8th Cir. July 8, 2008):
At trial, each time the Government moved to admit evidence that Defendant's pretrial motion sought to suppress (namely, the firearms and ammunition seized from Defendant's home), defense counsel stated "no objection." "Normally the denial of a pretrial motion to suppress evidence preserves the objection for appeal and defense counsel need not renew the objection at trial." United States v. Johnson, 906 F.2d 1285, 1290 (8th Cir. 1990); accord Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339, 353 (1958) (denial of suppression motion by the trial court generally "preserves the point and renders it unnecessary again to object when such evidence is offered at trial")...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on July 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Mr. Brown Instant Coffee
Possible Melamine Contamination Prompts Canadian Agency to Issue Warning
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Specific Objection Must Immediately Follow Inadmissible Evidence
Pretrial Objections To Parol Evidence Not Enough To Save Issue For Appeal
Judiciary Hearing on Voter Suppression









