ADVERTISEMENT

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Litigation

: How Appealing

May a criminal defendant who has chosen to represent himself at trial without the assistance of counsel elect, through disruptive conduct that causes him to be removed from the courtroom, to forfeit his ability to cross-examine adverse witnesses?

ADVERTISEMENTS

May a criminal defendant who has chosen to represent himself at trial without the assistance of counsel elect, through disruptive conduct that causes him to be removed from the courtroom, to forfeit his ability to cross-examine adverse witnesses? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a ruling issued today, suggests that this question is worthy of U.S. Supreme Court review.

Full post as published by How Appealing on July 08, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Law Articles

Missing Children
Databases and organizations

Lawsuits and Settlements

Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.

Criminal Law
If you have been arrested or mistreated by police you should speak to a criminal law attorney.

Medical Tubing Errors Leading to Adverse Events Including Death
Medical Tubing Errors Leading to Adverse Events Including Death

CellCept
Roche Issues Changes to Warnings and Adverse Events

Wal-Mart
Avoids Criminal Charges over Clerk's Death

Wrinkle-Fillers
FDA to Review Labeling due to Adverse Event Reports

Related Searches

US Law

#1 Online Legal Resource

Ask Legal Questions

US Law Directory

Class Action Lawsuits

Celebrity Justice

OJ Simpson

VIDEO: NYPD rendering first aid to Empire State Building shooter
On 08-25 at 15:46PM

Acute perpendicular parking #NYPD #NYFD
On 08-18 at 22:18PM

Parallel parking gone bad. Too much gas UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:41PM

UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:25PM

Twitter suspends journalist critical of broadcast partner's coverage on dubious grounds @guyadams #nbcfail #twitterfail
On 07-30 at 17:57PM

Model example of 1st Amendment suppression by the People of New York City's Michael Bloomberg #OWS #NYPD
On 07-12 at 21:07PM

AG Holder lackadaisical on Operation in our Sites domain name seizures & RIAA lobbied free speech suppression @dajaz1
On 06-08 at 22:44PM

Why is the Catholic Church going to court over Obama contraception policy? @NewYorker commentary
On 05-31 at 10:08AM

Monks sue Louisiana for right to sell caskets made from forrest destroyed by Katrina
On 05-31 at 07:47AM

Are the abortion ultrasound laws headed for the Supreme Court?
On 05-15 at 21:52PM

FOLLOW USLaw.com ON TWITTER

Custom Legal Documents

Your Blog Subscriptions Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc

Earn a law-related degree

Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.

Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

SCOTUS holds that states may require defendants with limited capacity to be represented by counsel

Confrontation, Counsel and a Defendant Who Just Won't Behave Himself

Indiana v. Edwards - Right to Self-Represent Limited

Ineffective assistance and adequacy of a prior opportunity for cross

Q: Does a Criminal Defendant Forfeit His Right to Counsel by Punching Said Counsel in the Face

Indiana v. Edwards & Competency

0.0181 secs (new cache)