Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> New York Medical Malpractice Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: New York Medical Malpractice BlogJudgment Non Obstante Verdicto - What Is It, And Why Should You Care?
By Gerry Oginski
Judgment non-obstante verdicto means that the lawyer is asking the judge to reverse the award or judgment despite the award. It's a Latin term used to say that the judgment should be overturned despite the verdict. Typically, a lawyer will make this argument when the jury has reached a decision that is so contrary to the evidence that's been presented.
For example, where an injury victim of hospital wrongdoing has presented eyewitnesses and expert doctors who have testified and confirmed that the treatment she received departed from good care, and the defense does not contradict those claims- it would appear that the decision is a 'no-brainer' and the doctor or hospital should be held responsible. However, for unknown reasons, the jury renders a verdict for the defense. In that instance the victims' attorney asks the Judge to set aside the jury verdict as being against the weight of the evidence.
A decision to overturn a jury verdict by a trial judge does not happen that often in New York- but on occasion it does.
If your attorney tells you that he can't understand how the jury could possibly have awarded a decision that they did, in all likelihood, your lawyer will suggest asking the Court to disregard the jury's award and render a verdict in your favor. In the alternative, he may also ask for a new trial.
Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office. www.oginski-law.com
516-487-8207
Full post as published by New York Medical Malpractice Blog on January 20, 2008 (boomark / email).
Adult Care
Friendship Care Assisted Living ordered to pay $20,000 fine for facility violations and negligence.
Lawsuit Filed Against Legacy Health Care Facilities for Nursing Home Abuse
Legacy Health Care Facilities Face Class Action Over Allegations of Abuse
Coventry Health Care, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Coventry Health Care, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
$1Million Settlement Reached in Toxic Kiddie Kollege Day Care Lawsuit
$1 Million Settlement Reached in Toxic Kiddie Kollege Day Care Lawsuit
California Hospitals
Fined for Shoddy Care
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations

Saffran Final Judgment Upped to $501 Million Against Boston Scientific
Is it Legal for a Judgment to Survive Bankruptcy
Foreseeable Misuse: Court Upholds $2 Million Judgment Against Lawn Mower Company







